36 Comments
User's avatar
Spike's avatar

And broadcasting the Russians definitely won't switch of tomorrow

Expand full comment
Max Rottersman's avatar

I linked to this story on my DepletionCurve X account. Also created a graphic. If you'd ever like a cartoon for one of your stories let me know and I'll see what I can figure out. https://x.com/DepletionCurve/status/1920522203147252031

Expand full comment
Wayne's avatar

See you in Odesa. I’ll let you buy me a coffee.

😉

Expand full comment
Wayne's avatar

PS great article.

Expand full comment
Cliff Pennalligen's avatar

Benjamin, do you think they use AI to process all the signals and come up a with navigation strategy?

Expand full comment
Paul Stone's avatar

Most likely not AI - just an algorithm.

Expand full comment
Antony Van der Mude's avatar

THanks. Great description. Very informative.

Expand full comment
Tupolev16's avatar

Indeed, a really interesting article. Looks like EW is effective only against FPVs and cheap short-legged recon drones.

I am also fond of predictions. Tom might remember that back in April 2022 I was predicting at Acig the swap of Iranian drones for SuperFlankers. Sadly, red tape in both countries is very slow, so Russia got Persian drones only in 2023, while SuperFlankers...well...you know it.

Anyway, my prediction (effectively, advice) for RU athourities is to buy/copy Iranian "358" missile asap. It will be a cheap and perfect weapon against UA long-range drones. If Tom's boasting about GenShtab people reading his blog is true, hope that they will think about it.

Russia already has a good track record of employing drones-interceptors at front line, see some fresh videos:

https://t.me/faceofwar/47515

Next logical step is "358" missile

Expand full comment
James Touza's avatar

That 358 as described by Tom looks game changing, my question is who really developed the thing, Iran, China, or others?

Expand full comment
Tupolev16's avatar

Iranians, being low on money after the war with Iraq, being under heavy sanctions and due to low oil prices in 90s, have been investing heavily in "cheap" weapons development for the last 30 years. They did not spend billions on expensive fancy toys but were steadily looking for some cheap mass means of war. And they succeeded. They armed Houties that managed to deter Gulf armies, broke the back of Daesh, made Israel go crazy about Persian ballictic missiles and, finally, helped Russia a lot with cheap war-of-attrition winning drones.

Expand full comment
Hans Torvatn's avatar

If you want to advice the Russian GenStab why not just send them your advice? Here they might be suspicious of your intentions.

Expand full comment
Joshu's Dog's avatar

What is the quid pro quo for all this Iranian stuff if Iran isn't getting its Su-35s?

It's starting to look very "now or never" for that deal.

Expand full comment
Tupolev16's avatar

Such deals are classified and we can only guess by getting indirect facts via mass media. Iran got some Yak-130s, there are many articles and videos about that. Without SuperFlankers the purchase of Mittens is sensless. So, I hope that the deal for Su-35 will be completed. Who knows may be it's already started.

Expand full comment
James Touza's avatar

Thanks Ben, this makes sense, and the Kremlin will never turn off the PRBS Machine.

Expand full comment
Noveskes Rock's avatar

And of course it doesn't just affect Russia - the same technique can be used against literally every other country in the world (US, Japan, Nigeria, Brazil, etc.). Even the most primitive countries have cell towers, radio stations, etc. The inbound unit can be totally passive just vectoring off inbound signals tied to fixed locations - what an elegant solution.

Expand full comment
Russia News Reports's avatar

No NATO country will let Ukraine use their weapons and personnel to strike Russia tomorrow. So expect lots and lots of drones.

Expand full comment
James's avatar

"Today we see Moscow’s communication systems being limited. Why? To deny Ukraine Signal of Opportunity Navigation.' As I understand it, it is mobile data, not voice or SMS services that is being turned off. And this is to prevent live-streaming of any embarrassing incident.

Of course these are not limited to Ukrainian actions - the T-14s might break down again.

Expand full comment
Russia News Reports's avatar

The parade will be livestreamed by many news agencies, including westerners. Maybe try using your brain?

Expand full comment
Gary Behrens's avatar

Thanks Benjamin, for this very interesting article I like how it is a step up for Ukraine

Expand full comment
Hans Torvatn's avatar

Thanks for this analysis. It would seem that SoOp could be used as a backup navigation system in case someone jammed GPS or some other turned it of.

Expand full comment
Colin's avatar

RV Jones in WWII would have utterly loved this method of navigation.

Expand full comment
korkyrian's avatar

I guess it works in Great Britain and US , too.

Expand full comment
Paul Stone's avatar

Could just use GPS in that case.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
May 9
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Paul Stone's avatar

> Russia is absolutely able to annihilate all of Ukraine

Only with the use of nuclear weapons.

> Still, they follow what our host calls a certain military and political etiquette.

Russia does no such thing. They bomb civilians, hospitals, elementary schools, and playgrounds. They kidnap children, murder POWs, rape and murder civilians. They’re monsters.

Expand full comment
korkyrian's avatar

Facts do not lie.

In RussoUkrainian war most of the dead are soldiers

In US led wars, in Gaza war, civilians die in 10:1 or 20:1 proportion

Expand full comment
Paul Stone's avatar

The majority of dead during the invasion of Iraq were soldiers. It was during the occupation and insurgency that the civilian casualties came about - many not directly due to American forces.

The fact is that Russia targets civilians, which is a war crime. They also kidnap children.

Expand full comment
korkyrian's avatar

Paul,

The great enemy of clear language is insincerity.

In our time, political comments on Substack are frequently defence of indefensible.

it is a fact, publicly available, and not contested

from Vietnam, to Iraq, to Afghanistan,

Americans kill 10 to 20 civilian for every enemy soldier'combatant

this ratio is part of a military doctrine

it is how Americans choose targets

On children

Russian treat Russian speaking children as their own

It is difficult to say the same for Americans or Israelis

Expand full comment
korkyrian's avatar

Could be used by Houthis, or anyone really, disguised as Houthi, to attack targets in Britain and US.

Expand full comment
korkyrian's avatar

Israel. If it works it will be tested against Israel. And if there is a solution, it will come from Israel. And if there isn't ...

Expand full comment
Alternative Lives R Available's avatar

For every defence, there is an offensive strategy. What happens if Ukrainien drones simply aim for the 'holes' in electromagnetic signals, where everything is blocked? From there on in, it can use visual or radar or heat seeking, etc. to find its targets.

Expand full comment