8 Comments

I love the way this is done with diagrams which are then overlaid on photographs of real terrain. Briliant!

Expand full comment

I know it’s better to be safe than sorry but it’s concerning that Ukraine is building defensive lines generally behind the current lines. That sounds expensive and exhausting and I doubt they’d be doing it unless there’s a chance such lines in the rear are needed… they aren’t digging for the good exercise

Expand full comment

It's risk management: What is the risk? What is the likelihood the event will happen? What would be the impact of the event? Given the impact, whatever the likelihood, it is indeed better to be safe than sorry.

The Russians aren't going to break through and overrun Ukraine. Territory is important, but more important than territory is the preservation of Ukraine's capabilities and the attrition of Russian equipment and manpower. Prepared defenses on chosen terrain can maximize those effects.

Expand full comment

What alternative do u propose?

Expand full comment

Well, the worst thing is that Ukraine started building these lines in 2024 and not in 2022 or (most preferably!) before 2021.

Ahh, anyway - better late than sorry.

Expand full comment

Nice write up Donald . Enjoyed reading this one.

Expand full comment

Ukraine is only producing 20 000 mortar rounds per month today. The first economy in the EU like Germany will produce 16 666 shells per month in the third year after starting. Ukraine is considering to increase the production, but Germany thinks it's good enough for the next decade. It's all you should know about a forecast horizon.

https://mil.in.ua/en/news/new-rheinmetall-plant-will-produce-200-000-rounds-of-ammunition-per-year/

Expand full comment

Thanks Don. Really nice one (like the one with force multipliers). Forecasts look grim but no one knows what future will bring. Both good and bad.

Expand full comment