Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Vasyl''s avatar

Thank you. Interesting insight.

Let's wait and see.

BTW - you are probably aware already - ruzzia has blown Kakhovka Dam. That has multiple military consequences (and even more - civilian).

Expand full comment
Harsányi László's avatar

Thank you for the qick and dirty!

- Re missile warfare: this "wasting the perciousss missiles" complain comes up often. While it was obviously right when UAF had only (or mainly) S-300 against EVERYTHING, since the arrival of the different western systems it's clearly not true. Also, the price tag should compared to the value of the defended item - not to the destroyed one. Of course, it is better if you can choose from multiple options, but if there is only one, then you use that one - that's why you put that bloody system there. If somebody complains that this isn't the most effective use, then well, provide more alternatives, the UAF will be pretty happy about it.

- ground maneuvers: On the Belgorod front there were news a few days ago about attack on Urazovo as well, but then it disappeared. To me that was the first meaningful target, with the chance to cut the Troitske-Biloukraine-Starobilsk railway, but it can easily be that the VSRF came to the same conclusions and had much stronger forces there.

- fresh news that the Russians blew up the Nova Kahovka dam, causing serious flods. Previously it was said that the dam is crucial to the Enerhodar NPP cooling too, so it's quite disturbing news.

- Re MRAPS and M113: I have a nagging feeling that because the western heavy ground equipment comes so slowly and its replenishment is practically impossible (t least not in the timeframe of an operation), the UAF is a little shy to use them. Losses would be inevitable and success can not be guaranteed even with them, so they try to avoid the same "wasting our precioussss money" reactions when a destroyed Leo appears on Telegram without Big UAF Victory tags.

Expand full comment
22 more comments...

No posts