Discussion about this post

User's avatar
MaxN's avatar

perfect analysis, but unfortunately no good news for UA. more bad news: HU and SK refused to take part in art ammo supply union (it was expected, but is still very unpleasant)

Zirkons seems to be launched from ground launchers based on standard sea 40Ft containers (similar art and fashion as Shakheds launcher), they use not liquid, but hard reactive fuel (RUMINT). Fortunately, production capacities are very limited. Hope, debils in the US are able at least to control sanctions regime, if not supporting UA with funds and ammos: almost 90% of chips and micro schemes are of US/Taiwan/EU origin

Expand full comment
Andrew's avatar

Hi Tom. I was in Kyiv when those missiles hit, so can tell you a few points that were a bit incorrect in your writeup that may or may not change some of your analysis. First, your sequence is a bit off. The first missiles came to Kyiv, and then quite a bit later they used the Zircon's to attack Poltava and Odesa. We indeed had a warning in Kyiv, but it was less than a minute. The initial reports were that the missiles were headed to Mykolaiv, but they kept flying; clearly they tricked the people who operate the warning system. Last, there was one other usage of the zircon on Kyiv in February. You can find some info here: https://t.me/war_monitor/14504. Even though it had happened before, it indeed felt very new and unusual and people are very tense about these extremely fast missiles. Let's not forget that the Russians also snuck the Kinzhal attack on Stryi the day before. We usually get warning that Mig-31ks are in the air, but on sunday we received warning when the missiles were already almost to Lviv oblast. I'd say the russians have some new tactics and the air alarm is not being triggered as quickly. Hope this helps.

Expand full comment
118 more comments...

No posts