Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Hans Torvatn's avatar

Regarding your analysis the crux of it seems to be that Russian attacks are slowly and expensively creeping forward. Their airforce is not stopped in its attacks and the ground troops are dying but grinding on. One can of course hope that this type of attacks becomes so expensive that the troops break, but I don’t really believe so. Breaking will first happen when they stop advancing. And while this hurts Russia in decades to come that doesn’t stop Putin. So something has to be done to stop Russian progress. Probably means some change in tactics.

Expand full comment
Hans Torvatn's avatar

According to Norwegian news sources Peskov used the Word « War » to describe the situation in Ukraine. A war with the west. The analysis given for the reason of this language shift was (surprise surprise) as a preparation for a general mobilization. Now you write « while I’m joining the army of those wondering if this is another of FSB’s false flag operations: a ‘terrorist attack in Moscow’ would ‘automatically authorise’ Pudding to do whatever he wants to do… (including mobilising youngsters Muscovites). ». Damn « lucky » with that attack Putin? I don’t know whether he simply allowed it to happen or orchestrated it. But the attack suited him well, and he will use it.

Expand full comment
145 more comments...

No posts