Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Harsányi László's avatar

Thank you for the update!

- Re: infantry fares better than armor: I think this is the straight result of having neither effective air cover nor enough ECM/anti-UAV cabapility. Small infantry units are less likely being the direct target of artillery, mainly in the "bocage country". Armor must be at least somewhat concentrated and esier to target. Also, just as you wrote, an amor unit remains the target even after their first hits. An infantry unit can disperse and regroup elsewhere. And third, I don't think any side has a clue how to use "classic armor tactics" when almost defensless from above and the battlefield can be mined in hours. (Which goes back to your permanent rant that the UAF needs artillery, artillery and maybe a little more artillery.)

- Re: directions. "That's where we're starting the war." - said Henry Fonda's character in The Longest Day, when realized they were not on the right beach. I think the UAF is in a similar situation now. Both the Tokmak-Melitopol and the Volnovakha-Mariupol direction offered better rewards than the attack from Velika Novosilka - but if they have the momentum there and stalling elswhere, then that's where they are pushing. The big question is how much reserve the VSRF has in this direction, and if the advance successful, are they willing to weaken the other fronts, just to stop it? The good news is that - if the reports are correct - up till now only a fraction of the newly established and equipped UAF units are deployed, so hopefully they have reserves to exploit any opportunity.

Expand full comment
Katharine's avatar

It just blows my mind. They inflict ecocide, pure disaster, AND they don’t even let the rescuers save those who managed to survive this terror. I don’t think I’ll ever fathom the unimaginable levels of cruelty, inhumanity and pure barbarism that ruzzians inflict on Ukrainians

Expand full comment
71 more comments...

No posts