87 Comments
User's avatar
Joshu's Dog's avatar

Thanks again for the piquant analysis. So the IRGC-State's strategy depended on a buffer zone in Syria, and they went all-in on it, with huge opportunity costs for procurement. But they lost, and they were not exactly on the right side of history in Syria anyway. OK, makes sense. The Israelis are many things, but not stupid, and Netanyahu realized he could cut the Gordian Knot.

But where's the theory of political victory? Where's the plan to transform a bombing campaign against a helpless Iran into stable regime change? The Trump base is devouring itself with rage about "Iraq 2.0." They have to be sold the delusion of a short sharp war -- again. Israel's political capital and reputation is also in the toilet.

Expand full comment
Marmot's avatar
1dEdited

Netanyahu has no plan, just bomb Iran and watch social media for reactions. He needs some new war to overshadow Gaza massacres and the mess there and internal Israeli problems too. Bombing Iranian nuclear facilities, what social media say? Aah good. Bombing Iranian TV, what social media says? Oh, wrong. Talk about regime change? Aah good. Etc.

BTW. if regime in Iran falls, there would not be any democratic rule, but a civil war like in Iraq or Syria.

Expand full comment
Joshu's Dog's avatar

Probably. But I think Iran is not a tribal fabric like the other countries where "divide et impera" keeps on working. What they *could* go for is a CIA/Mossad-supported secular/liberal/Pahlavist counterrevolution, but I don't think that is going to happen while there is an external enemy to rally against - we saw this movie in the 1980s. The "best" case for Netanyahu is a weak Iranian state too distracted by fighting regional separatist movements to go straight ahead and restart the nuclear programme in anger. Again this is just kicking the can down the road for "Jewish Rhodesia." Meanwhile, thanks to Israel, Western and American "soft power" is officially about as dead as the USSR.

Expand full comment
Marmot's avatar
1dEdited

Persians are chauvinists, other nations inside Iran do not feel it good. E.g. some Balochis are already fighting for independence, many Azeris (Turkish) would like to join Turkey or Azerbaidjan. Yes some naive people would speak about how they go together well, but not all feel the same. It was similar in former Yugoslavia - nationalists will take upper hand over idealists (just because it's simpler to persuade people with rage than with tolerance.) The only chance for Iran to avoid civil war in case of regime fall is to remember 2 very bad examples in their neighbourhood.

Expand full comment
Joshu's Dog's avatar

True.

Drone warfare and US air superiority could also change the calculus for separatist movements. But this is a recipe for a bloodbath, not a "secular Iran."

Expand full comment
WS68's avatar

Yugoslavia was an artificial construct, being was six countries in one.

Expand full comment
ghanshyam joshi's avatar

Iran is the only natural country not created by Brits in that region including Pakistan. Arabs owe to Lawrence of Arabia. Iranians have field medalist and highly qualified person in there diaspora uncanny compared to other gulf states.

Expand full comment
Marmot's avatar

Natural like European borders before WWI?

Expand full comment
ghanshyam joshi's avatar

Natural like an old civilization. Not like gulf kingdom states . Iran only mistake is poking Israel.

Expand full comment
Oskar Krempl's avatar

Ähem, take a look at what was Iran at the end of 18th century. Yes in 1917 the British even tried to convert it into a protecorate, but failed.

Expand full comment
James Touza's avatar

Russians were there in WWI too, then Britain and Russia repeated the same show in WWII.

Expand full comment
WS68's avatar

Agreed, Iran is not tribal and its civil society is much more developed than people want to give it credit for. Example being a colleague of mine dwent to Iran for a private medical operation to skip the NHS queues.

Expand full comment
Oskar Krempl's avatar

States were never ethnically "clean" (yes it is a stupid term), as the borders were always changing. Sometimes they were made less ethnically "unclean" (another stupid term) by their government by mass killings and mass expulsions.

The concept of national states itself is an invention of the 19th century.

Iran isn't different in it's ethnic compositions. Just take a short look back in time after WW II when Iran had to struggle to get back full control over the whole state.

Expand full comment
Marmot's avatar

Shah Pahlavi was a brutal dictator. That's why Iranians started revolution against him in 1979, some of them hoping in democracy. There were more groups sometime fighting together, sometimes each other .... and the winner was islamist Khomeini.

So, Pahlavi has some support, but far from majority of Iranians. (Iranian opposition is fragmented.)

Expand full comment
martin.english@gmail.com's avatar

Israel has already won, if the only mission was to destroy Iran's nuclear capability.

This leads me to believe Israel's objective is to destroy the IGRC and the religious dictatorship.

Expand full comment
Joshu's Dog's avatar

Fordow needs a bunker buster, at the minimum.

Expand full comment
Marmot's avatar

Iranian capabilty is weakened, but not destroyed. Fordo has not even be bombed yet, because Israelis know they are not able to even damage it.

Netanjahu's objectives of Iran war are inside Israel.

Expand full comment
Oskar Krempl's avatar

IMHO their only true goal is Erez Israel. Everything else is just PR stuff for the masses, including government change.

Bibi talked via TV in ENGLISH to Iranian people instead of using FARSI! Simply too lazy to get a minimum of credibility.

Expand full comment
Oskar Krempl's avatar

Yes the responsible Israelis are not stupid, but short sighted. Even Bibi thinks Erez Israel is now close, which is his true politicial goal additionally to not going to prison.

Expand full comment
Joshu's Dog's avatar

It is, as per Tom's current refrain, completely antisemitic to read Genesis 15:18–21.

Expand full comment
Roland Davis's avatar

"piquant" - neat!

Expand full comment
Marmot's avatar

Dumpf gov about Ayatollah Ali Khamenei assasination: "Have the Iranians killed an American yet? No. Until they do we're not even talking about going after the political leadership," said one of the sources, a senior U.S. administration official.

Meanwhile a U.S. citizen has been killed in Kyiv by Russian attack. Dump gov condemns the attack. Real powerful MAGA reaction.

Expand full comment
ghanshyam joshi's avatar

Did an Iranian fleet of 200-300 Su-35 or Su-27 would have made any difference in the outcome.. ?

Expand full comment
Tupolev16's avatar

Yes, fleet in being. Always matters

Expand full comment
Pawel Kasperek's avatar

Only problem, it would be entire production run of the last 20 years, so...

Expand full comment
Sarcastosaurus's avatar

200-300 Su-35s?

That would require Putin being ready to sell at least a licence for their production and the production of their engines to Iran. Which is what he refused to do even for 24-30 Su-35s, which is why the deal fell through.

But yes: an IRIAF with 200-300 Su-35s would've been 'nothing but trouble' for the IASF.

Expand full comment
arthur brogard's avatar

I"m just overwhelmed by the sarcasm or, rather, the mixture of sarcasm, injured perplexity and angry sincerity and don't know what to believe.

I suppose the author won't want to clarify but perhaps some observer?

What is he saying?

I"m thinking this:

. Iran has no chance.

. Israel and Russia are in bed together.

. the whole show is run by oligarchs, jewish, arab and russian

. the Irani forces are worse even than the russians were in '14.

. nevertheless the iranians are scoring some hits.

is that it? anywhere close?

Expand full comment
Joshu's Dog's avatar

One consistent reasoned thread running throughout all of it is criticism of the IRGC.

What was the road not taken then? Playing catch-up building garbage "jihad self-sufficiency" jets like F-5 clones? (The great movie "Mansour" on YouTube shows what a project that was.)

Buying jets along with manufacturing facilities from China? I think Xi has missed a trick here. And Putin has led Iran into many dead ends.

Expand full comment
James Touza's avatar

China is likely to fill in the empty space formerly occupied by Russia, it's what they do. I think Tom mentioned they were sending transports filled with who knows what to eastern Iran.

Expand full comment
ZenithA's avatar

Dear Tom, thank you! About the terms, you are using "anti-Semitic" often, but I was wondering about the roots of the term, and it seems technically speaking Arab nations are Semites too. So anti-Semitic is a bit biased term. I was thinking of replacement and Judeophob sounds a bit more precise, maybe? Though it is probably not the precise too, since not every Jew around the world is the same. So anti-Zionist would sound most precise, but then all sarcasm is going out with that change too 😅 Sorry can not hold myself 😂

Do you know of any average person attitude on the streets of Tehran towards all this? Is there massive support or standing aside, or?

Will this be Ukrainian style "2 weeks" campaign. Or they would reach their goals soon you think?

Expand full comment
Sarcastosaurus's avatar

It's anti-Semitic to complain about the indiscriminate use of 'anti-Semitism'...

...and, please, NO: you can't post such blasphemies around the social media. No, really: you can't.

Zionists insist that Arabs are no Semites. Only Zionists are Semites. Especially when coming from Russia.

Besides, they're feeling offended and finding it very anti-Semitic to call them Zionists...

(....just summarising different 1st-hand-experiences...)

Expand full comment
Roland Davis's avatar

Perfectly true. I have received hysterical accusations of antisemitism for referring to the "antisemitism card".

Expand full comment
ZenithA's avatar

Dear Tom, you are not only obsessively focused on calling yourself anti-Semite, but also you are now calling me anti-Semite, which sounds quite compulsive. I thereby recall my like on your original answer, since the only true Semites may interpret this as a sign of supporting your unconfirmed anti-Semitism. And also I am adopting a policy of being zip-lip on the topic for any following instance of the same 🤐

Expand full comment
vishal chauhan's avatar

Honestly, after going through this, all the groups in this war look pretty much alike. It's almost as if it doesn't matter who gets wiped out.

Expand full comment
Sarcastosaurus's avatar

This is nothing else but two gangs of idiotic, fascistoid megalomaniacs fighting each other to the last Iranian and Israeli.

Expand full comment
RG's avatar

and yet one is very different than the other.

Expand full comment
Zura's avatar

In the grim darkness of future, there is only War.

Expand full comment
Lukas's avatar

"It’s becoming quite pointless to post such features if I all the time have to remind about them, because people are not reading them… isn’t it? "

People new to this blog will be very thankful being notified of the existence of said articles.. I know I was. I hope you continue posting/reporting

Expand full comment
Hans Torvatn's avatar

And we who have read it might remember. It’s not like I remember everything I read.

Expand full comment
Oskar Krempl's avatar

No one does.

Expand full comment
ParanoidNow's avatar

The oldest and the fartest among the old farts in Iran is still there. I guess that if he is eliminated, Iran will actually have a chance against Israel in the long term.

Expand full comment
Sarcastosaurus's avatar

Waiting to see such theories being confirmed ever since he's coupped himself to power and locked half the Iranian Shi'a clergy into a house-arrest... some 30 years ago...

Expand full comment
Andrii's avatar

Doesn't he have a 55-year old heir?

Expand full comment
James Touza's avatar

Khomeini's great grandson is a junior cleric running around with a black turban, so he could be future Supreme Leader. Probably more likely than Don Jr. ever becoming president.

Expand full comment
Petr's avatar
1dEdited

Why are Iranian missiles so inaccurate (for example, the attack on the of center Mossad where the missiles deviated by up to 2 km, see. https://ibb.co/PZsMjYKs) Could it be that Israel is spoofing GPS coordinates for importen targets?

Expand full comment
Sarcastosaurus's avatar

Some are inaccurate - see liquid-fuelled models of their '1st Generation' (though many meanwhile modified to carry MIRVs), perhaps also those of the '2nd Generation'.

But, who's said their 3rd Generation IRBMs are inaccurate?

Expand full comment
Petr's avatar

I judge the inaccuracy based on the fact that the impacts on the photograph are so far from the target they were aimed at. However, if the missiles are guided by GPS coordinates, they can be easily spoofing. Or can they? Or are Iranian missiles guided in some other way?

Expand full comment
Sarcastosaurus's avatar

AFAIK, 1st Gen = INS; 2nd Gen = INS + GPS; 3rd Gen = INS + some sort of terminal guidance.

Expand full comment
Marmot's avatar
1dEdited

How Iranians get intel on Israel military mobile targets? They own satellite program seems modest. Do they have some intel form Russia or China?

Expand full comment
Sarcastosaurus's avatar

They do have one high-res photo-recce satellite in orbit (Khayyam or something), and several smaller systems, too. That's why yesterday the Israelis targeted the Iranian Space Agency HQ.

Expand full comment
Marmot's avatar

The problem with hi-res satellites is to get real-time data. But it's possible Israelis do not move their SAMs often ....

Expand full comment
Sarcastosaurus's avatar

The fact stuff like Iron Dome (meanwhile used in sheer desperation, in hope one might hit anything), David's Sling, Arrow II and III is 'trailer mounted' is not making them 'mobile', and even less so 're-deployed every 5 minutes'.

Expand full comment
Марченко Сергей's avatar

And how do missiles/drones target Israeli air defense systems? This is also relevant for Ukraine - I heard a song on TikTok from a Russian soldier about how Petriot was destroyed yesterday during an attack on Zhulyany.

Expand full comment
Sarcastosaurus's avatar

Sergey,

it's a public secret that one of PSU's Patriot SAM-sites is 'permanently' deployed at the Zhuliany Airport. So much so, one can see revetments constructed for protection of their launchers on the Google Maps.

Extracting coordinates for such strikes is anything else than hard. Doesn't mean the entire battery is destroyed if one launcher is knocked out, though.

The same is valid for the ways the Iranians are targeting Israel.

Expand full comment
ParanoidNow's avatar

Thanks Tom,

Sorry but I did get it - do you think that the missile targets of Iran make sense or not? To me it seems that attacking Mosads HQ is pointless

Expand full comment
Sarcastosaurus's avatar

Is discussed in the Part 2 now.

Expand full comment
Chris P.'s avatar

Regardless of the fact that Iran, as a whole, stands no chance against Israel and the US, whose primary goal is to create a lot of spectacular TV images, is this tactic of firing salvos of "only" 10 to 30 rockets and then quickly hiding the TELs the "best" the Iranian military can do in this situation? Or is it just another tactic that must be considered ineffective overall?

Expand full comment
Sarcastosaurus's avatar

That's IRGC's PRBS. They've meanwhile learned their lesson.

Expand full comment
Becoming Human's avatar

Good to see you putting the “sarcasto-“ back in sarcastosaurus!

Love it

Expand full comment
WS68's avatar
1dEdited

So Tom, are you saying Western military jet fighter aircraft have taken part in exercises in China? Maybe I misunderstood. If so, that is truly incredible!

Even if just if it was in the ME, still pretty mad!

Expand full comment
Sarcastosaurus's avatar

Yes, UAEAF deployed its Mirage 2000s there, plus C-17s etc...

Expand full comment
Velociraver's avatar

Spellcheck is a thing. Do better.

Expand full comment
Sarcastosaurus's avatar

Ignoring is the best advice. Don't read.

Expand full comment
osidd's avatar

It's sort of fascinating to have the Iranians be the "good-guys" that aren't targeting civilians like Israel always does.

Expand full comment
Sarcastosaurus's avatar

Definitely 'unusual'.

BTW, as of today, HR-groups reported 587 Iranian civilians as killed by the Israelis, and 24 Israelis killed by Iranians.

Expand full comment