Discussion about this post

User's avatar
James Coffey's avatar

I looked up the Dahiya doctrine on wikipedia and found this discussion:

"The Dahiya doctrine, or Dahya doctrine, is an Israeli military strategy involving the large-scale destruction of civilian infrastructure, or domicide, to pressure hostile governments. " Furthermore and Israeli colonel amplified the doctrine by writing that Israel "should target economic interests and the centers of civilian power that support the organization" . . . "The logic is to harm the civilian population so much so that they will then turn against the militants, forcing the enemy to sue for peace."

This seems to me to have been taken from the Soviet . . . ah . . . er . . . ahem! ahem! AHEM! . . . Russian playbook of military operations against an enemy. Concidence? I hardly think so.

I also recall from my dim, dark past when I was a mere tadpole (OK a college student) that historians have concluded from the Allied strategic bombing of the Third Reich during World War II [and Japan] that such bombing does not induce the victim population to pressure its leaders to surrender, negotiate, or otherwise conform to the wishes of the Allies undertaking such strategic bombing. The bombing achieved the opposite effect to unite the population even more closely with its leadership.****

I can only conclude that Israel's (and Russia's . . . and . . . et. al.) bombing of a target population will only serve to unite further that population with its leaders. The leader's or leaders' popularity is not an issue here. Certainly seems to me to apply to the Ukrainian population at least. Thus, such bombing ultimately is useless in the long run when it comes to persuading the enemy to cry "Uncle."

****I also think that we will see the Israeli population unite itself more closely with its very leader (Netanyahu) even though such a leader is unpopular with much of the Israeli electorate and even though such leader is a first rate son of a b*tch. Not saying in any way that the other leaders of the various waring groups are anything but total @$$holes too.

Expand full comment
Hrodland's avatar

I'm really starting to think that even the senior members of the IDF have never heard the term "guerrilla war."

Call me crazy, but I did read Mao's "On Guerrilla war." And his point was: if the counter-guerrilla force can't get control over the population, they will lose.

The Japanese were a lot more ruthless than the IDF, but that didn't lead to victory. And the IDF still has zero control over Gazans--while Hams has thousands of wanna-be recruits still...

(English Civil War jingle: "He whose house doth burn, must soldier turn.")

I thus fear that Hamas' 7 Oct attack drove most Israelis slightly (or greatly) crazy. And the few sane exceptions like Ayalon can't stop the craziness.

Example:

Bibi's announcement that the IDF is about to "free" the Lebanese--by bombing Beirut?! And then they're going to topple...the Ayatolahs?!

Honest question then:

Are the Israelis the worlds best tacticians--and world's worst strategists?

And if this is "anti-semitic."

Well then, is REALITY "anti-semitic??"

Expand full comment
34 more comments...

No posts