Discussion about this post

User's avatar
James's avatar

Thanks Tom - nice to have a report that is mostly good news. How significant would destruction (if that was acheived) of the jet fuel plant ? This seems a good way of reducing or eliminating the glide-bomb threat.

Expand full comment
Andrew Tanner's avatar

How to effectively counterattack with small numbers of troops is the intellectual problem that I'm trying to tackle a lot lately.

The solution likely has to focus on rescaling operations. To advance in the era of the machine gun required density on the advance only once sufficient fire support could be maintained or persistent infiltration across a broad front. The same basic relationship appears to hold true now that drones can form effective pakfronts.

Either you maintain a high tempo of shallow attacks across an entire front or isolate a sector with fires. Moscow keeps trying to meld the two approaches, imitating the old Red Army. Ukraine likely has to tailor the approach to the front. Isolation in Kherson, unpredictable grind on Azov front, area defense and shallow counterattacks elsewhere.

The Schwerpunkt is Moscow's systemic difficulty getting an accurate picture of what's happening. Overwhelm the higher echelons of command, and one or more fronts will crack for want of support.

Expand full comment
42 more comments...

No posts