Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Piotr's avatar

Just to be super precise "As all of NATO (except Spain) pledge to increase their defense spending to 5%" by the year 2035, so, rather distant perspective. More, for military is 3.5%, 1.5% is on "double-use" spending. For instance Italy wants to invest those money into building the bridge from Sicily to mainland. No doubts an important piece of infrastructure, if NATO is planning war with Tunisia (who knows!).

Even more, to be even more precise, the communication is that "NATO countries agreed", not "all NATO countries agreed", Spain was just openly frank, that they don't care. Others, like Belgium or Hungary, were not really hiding their negative attitude to those ideas, nevertheless they signed, who care what will happen in 10 years perspective in a democratic country, this can be someone else problem...

And, at last, I am old enough to remember NATO Summit in 2014, just after Russia invasion on Crimea and Donbas, where "NATO countries agreed" to spend 2% of GDP for military and except Poland, Greece (fearing Turkey) and to some extent France (spending tones of money of their expensive nuclear weapon arsenal) NOBODY didn't care AT ALL. Instead whole Europe was happily buying cheap Russian oil and gas.

So, I am not really cheering up that much yet. Let's wait and see what will happen in, say, 3 years perspective.

Expand full comment
Martin Belderson's avatar

That map of the maelstrom of units in XX Corps' sector depicts in one image all you and Tom have been talking about for years.

I would say, 'Thanks", but it is just too grim.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts