Discussion about this post

User's avatar
DannyMetal's avatar

" 4 to 6% unemployment is healthy for the economy. "

For a site that so proudly agitates against western oligarchies, I'm shocked you're using the ideas of the oligarchic neoliberal system ie NAIRU or Non-Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment.

This theory is designed to impoverish working classes and destroy their bargaining power.

It basically states that to limit inflation, salaries and wages growth must be stifled.

1. The 4-6% "healthy" unemployment range (or any other range) is purely arbitrary. There is no empirical evidence as to what unemployment range is healthy.

2. There have been plenty of instances when unemployment dropped below NAIRU without causing inflation (eg US in Clinton era).

3. There have also been numerous cases of inflation being higher despite high unemployment (so many examples).

4. Since NAIRU was embraced by US in 1970s, US real wages have collapsed. They only managed to get to their 1970 level in recent years.

5. Also since NAIRU was embraced, US middle class has shrunk from 61% to 51%.

6. NAIRU type policies limit wages growth which has meant more and more wealth is concentrated in the hands of a relative few.

7. Here in Australia NAIRU policies means our standard of living has continued to drop (now down to 2014). Over 1 in 4 Australians now suffer "food insecurity" (ie struggle to eat) due to decaying incomes relative to inflation.

8. NAIRU does nothing to stop companies profit gouging. In fact it helps them as they reduce their wage costs whilst increasing profit margins. In Australia, most recent inflation was due to profit gouging, not salaries and wages growth. Real salaries and wages are in decline.

And this was in spite of record low unemployment which means NAIRU is doing it's job: impoverishing people.

9. NAIRU literally works on premise of sacrificing living standards of large numbers of people by not having enough jobs for them. Eg if you have 100 million workers, that means 4-6 million of them are condemned to absolute poverty. But then the remaining 84-86 million have their living standards reduced because the 4-6 million unemployed act as a pool of reserve labour and reduce worker's bargaining rights.

10. In reality the "ideal" unemployment rate is unknown as each economy is different and even with economies there's a lot of variation depending on economic activities in different reasons. Eg a city might have 4-6% unemployed but a rural or regional area might have 25%.

Expand full comment
Rex Cajanding's avatar

Commenting on part 3, it’s like U Stab are working for the Russians than their people with the way they’re handling this war.

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts