Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Moriarty's avatar

Key Takeaways:

The summits are fruitless.

The US is pressuring Ukraine to make concessions to the Russian Federation.

China may use the “truce” to establish a military presence in Ukraine.

The war continues in a grueling mode with local successes on both sides.

The media is reporting events with great exaggeration, creating “information sensationalism.”

For my part, I would like to add that allowing China into the "peacekeeping mission" would be a very stupid decision. This would not only legalize Putin's direct ally and master - the Chinese army - on the territory of Ukraine, but would also help the Kremlin to more firmly control the occupied territories. Trump is quietly forbidding Ukraine from striking Russian territory with American weapons (or US components). He is pushing the idea of accepting the Kremlin's terms (actually capitulation). This is presented as "peacemaking" → so that Trump can distract attention from scandals in the US (Epstein, domestic corruption) and look like a candidate for the Nobel Peace Prize.

That is, he wants to simultaneously:

👉 help the Kremlin stop the war on terms that are favorable to him

👉 and present himself to the US and the world as a "peacemaker."

Trump and his team have systemic ties to Russia: business dependencies (Russian investments in American real estate, in particular in the Trump Organization); political ties (the infamous 2016 campaign with the intervention of Russian troll farms and the GRU); contacts of people from his entourage (Manafort, Flynn, Stone, etc.) with Kremlin structures. His rhetoric has always been consistent with the Kremlin’s: “NATO is obsolete”; “Europe must finance its own security”; “Crimea is Russian because everyone there speaks Russian”; doubts about helping Ukraine. In fact, Trump is the Kremlin's Trojan horse in American politics, used by US oligarchic circles that are not opposed to cooperation with Russia.

• The ban on attacking Russia is ideally suited to the Kremlin’s interests. It freezes the conflict in a form that is beneficial to Moscow (the occupied territories remain with Russia).

• Imposing peace “on Russian terms” is a long-standing Kremlin strategy: to push for “peace” through “useful idiots” (Lenin’s phrase) in Western elites.

• The Nobel Peace Prize for Trump = a bonus for the Kremlin. Because it legitimizes the "new Yalta" (the division of spheres of influence, where Ukraine is a "gray zone").

Nick Fotis's avatar

China entering Ukraine as a peacemaking force would be a monumentally stupid decision by the West. We all know that China isn't a neutral player (on 4th July, their foreign minister told that China cannot afford to let Russia lose the war in Ukraine).

I hope that nobody's stupid enough to let the PLA controlling Ukrainian borders.

That's like asking the fox to guard the henhouse.

30 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?