Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Anselmi Romeo's avatar

As always, a very interesting and illuminating read. I wanted to comment on your previous post, but I’ll take this opportunity now. That being said, I’m left with many questions.

I must say, I come from a leftist background, and over the years I’ve known many people who went to Rojava and fought there. Kurds were always framed as operating under leftist organizations and principles, gaining sympathy in Western leftist circles.

That being said, it always “hit me,” your stance on them in your commentary. I’ve read your blog and your books for many years now, so I know you “know better” on the subject, but… Yes, they may be designated as terrorists by most Western countries, but so was Al-Shara not long ago.

And I must say, the direction in which Al-Shara’s Syria is going seems clear: a state similar to Saudi Arabia or Egypt — a dictatorship, but aligned with the West, one that doesn’t antagonize Israel and therefore can have access to Western markets, technology, and weapons.

That being said, I have the impression that after so many years of war and suffering, the Syrian people just want peace and to rebuild. Al-Shara seems to be the “best horse” to reunify Syria, reintegrate it into the global economy, and bring some improvement to people’s lives. This is the political capital on which he is working.

It is indeed a very complex matter, filled with propaganda. I would love to hear your thoughts — if not here, then in your next commentary.

JG's avatar

Very much appreciate the detail on this Tom. Such detail is, of course, missing from Legacy Media 🤷🏼‍♂️.

23 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?