....and now mind: you're discussing this with somebody who read thousands of documents, hunderds of…
Nothing of what you've listed here is 'new' to me: really sorry to say it (for I love discussions in which I learn something, and would…
....and now mind: you're discussing this with somebody who read thousands of documents, hunderds of related articles, dozens of books, and participated in who-knows-how-many related discussions.
Nothing of what you've listed here is 'new' to me: really sorry to say it (for I love discussions in which I learn something, and would love learning something new from you): really, absolutely nothing.
'And still' - I wrote what I did.
Don't you think I might have a good reason for that (and that without having an agenda)?
After all, in 35+ years of research, I have never found any other document about the planning of those 'Zionist leaders in Palestine' from the times BEFORE Israel was officially declared for a sovereign country (15 May 1948). Sure, there is plentiful of mythology and hear-say. Little else of personal opinions. There're even more agendas, all aiming to whitewash what Israel was doing already before it officially came into being, not to talk about ever since. And there are plenty of people like you, who are going to do anything imaginable, just not accept the facts the way they are.
Facts like listed in that document I've mentioned above, and then there's a 'shipload' of additional facts in documents published by Prof Benny Morris - and all are describing their planning for ethnic cleansing of original Palestinian population from Palestine-cum-Israel, the land-grab of entire (or almost entire) Palestine, and then the expansionism of Israel during wars like 1956, 1967, 1982...
With other words: it is a well-documented matter of fact that there was a plan, a 'grand design' if you like, set up by people who then led Israel through the years 1948-1982, and they were realising that plan, step by step, running one aggressive war after the other.
They have created the very crisis lasting until today. Nobody else.
No matter who said what ever since, no matter where are your sympathies or what are you predilections, that's what's documented in crystal-clear fashion, and thus beyond any doubt.
...but you still come over to try to whitewash, deny, or sweettalk that into un-importance?
....and that because you simply have never heard of the JCS document in question, or what....?
Any idea how absolutely pointless such 'complaints/critique' are? What a waste of time and the same old denial of definitely confirmed facts your 'critique' is?
In all these years, characters like you have only proven one thing: you're all unable to accept the truth, and are going to repeat the same old mythology, again, and again, no matter how often proven wrong.
BTW, the same is valid for British nukes. Sure, if ripped out of context, then the British launched their own project in 1946, and detonated their first nuke in 1952. If you prefer to think that way, and 'see no relation to 1956': perfectly fine with me.
I would recommend a more thorough reading into that topic, though: insisting on obsolete and unsubstantiated dogmas is.... as said above: lame.